Historical Returns: What the Data Shows
Comparing property and shares returns is complex because both asset classes have multiple return components - income yield and capital growth - and the mix varies significantly by location, period, and specific asset.
- Australian shares (ASX All Ordinaries): Total return (capital growth + dividends) has averaged approximately 9.5-10% per year over 30+ years. Australian shares are unique globally for high dividend yields (3.5-4.5% grossed up including franking credits) due to the imputation system
- Australian residential property: Capital growth has averaged approximately 6-8% per year across major capital cities over 30 years. Gross rental yield of 2.5-4% adds to total return. Net yield after costs typically 1.5-2.5%. Total return approximately 8-10% per year - comparable to shares on a gross basis
- The leverage effect on property: Investors rarely buy shares with 80% borrowed money. Most property investors borrow 70-80% - this amplifies returns dramatically in a rising market but equally amplifies losses in a falling market
- Property return example with leverage: $100,000 deposit on a $500,000 property. Property rises 7% = $35,000 capital gain. Return on $100,000 equity = 35%. The same $100,000 in shares rising 10% = $10,000 = 10% return. Leverage dramatically outperforms in rising markets
- Leverage risk: That same $500,000 property falling 10% = -$50,000. Loss on $100,000 equity = -50%. Margin calls do not apply to property (lenders cannot force sale purely due to price fall) - but negative equity and serviceability stress are real risks
- Comparison caveat: Past returns do not guarantee future performance. Both asset classes have had extended periods of poor returns - Australian shares fell 50%+ in the GFC; many property markets corrected 20%+ in 2022-2023
Liquidity: The Critical Practical Difference
Liquidity - the ability to access your investment capital quickly - is one of the starkest practical differences between property and shares. This distinction has real consequences in financial emergencies and changing life circumstances.
- Shares: highly liquid: Australian-listed ETFs and shares can be sold within seconds during ASX trading hours (10am-4pm AEST). Settlement takes 2 business days (T+2). $500,000 in VAS can become cash in the bank within a week
- Property: highly illiquid: Selling residential property takes weeks to months - advertising, open homes, negotiation, cooling-off period, settlement (typically 30-90 days). Total time from decision to cash in hand: 2-6 months minimum
- Partial access: You cannot sell one bathroom of a house. You can sell 10% of your share portfolio. Shares allow precise capital access; property is all-or-nothing
- Line of credit on property: A mortgage redraw or investment property line of credit provides liquidity without selling - at a cost (interest). This partially mitigates the illiquidity but adds debt
- Implications for financial planning: Property is not suitable for money you may need access to within 5-7 years. It is also not suitable as the sole investment if you do not hold adequate liquid reserves separately. Many property investors are 'asset rich, cash poor'
- Forced sale risk: A financial emergency (job loss, health crisis, relationship breakdown) can force a property sale at the worst possible time - in a down market, under time pressure, incurring agent fees (2-3%), legal costs, and stamp duty to re-enter. Illiquidity has a real cost
Effort and Management: Active vs Passive
Property investing requires ongoing active management - tenants, maintenance, agents, compliance. Shares via index ETFs can be genuinely passive. The time cost of property is rarely factored into return comparisons.
- Property management effort: Finding and vetting tenants, managing rent collection, handling maintenance requests, annual smoke alarm and electrical compliance, property manager communication, end-of-year tax record compilation, insurance reviews, body corporate meetings (for units), council rates and water bills
- Property manager fees: Typically 7-10% of gross rent. On $30,000 annual rent, that is $2,100-$3,000 per year plus leasing fees ($500-$1,500 per new tenant). Factor into net yield calculations
- Vacancy periods: Between tenants, rental income stops. A 4-week vacancy on a $600/week property costs $2,400. Properties also face capex events - hot water systems ($1,500), air conditioning ($3,000-$5,000), painting ($5,000-$10,000), roof repairs
- Index ETF effort: Set up a brokerage account, invest monthly, reinvest dividends, track cost base in Sharesight. Total active management time: approximately 2-3 hours per year. Decisions are made quarterly or annually, not weekly
- Emotional management (shares): The effort of index share investing is mostly psychological - not acting during market downturns. The ASX falling 30% is unpleasant but requires no active response. A problem tenant or major repair requires immediate attention
- Who property suits: Investors who enjoy active management, understand construction and building quality, have time to research locations, and can handle cash flow variability. Who shares suit: investors who prefer passive management, value liquidity, or cannot commit management time
The Practical Case for Both: Portfolio Construction
The property vs shares debate is often a false dichotomy. Most high-net-worth Australian investors hold both - using each for their relative strengths.
- Australian investors' bias: The typical Australian investor is significantly overweight property - most household wealth sits in the family home plus one investment property. This concentration in a single illiquid asset class in a single country is not optimal portfolio construction
- International diversification (shares): Australian property is 100% exposed to Australia. A VGS ETF gives exposure to 1,500 companies across 23 developed markets - diversification that property cannot replicate
- Leverage access: Property is the most accessible form of leveraged investing for ordinary Australians - banks lend 80% LVR. Margin lending for shares exists but at lower LVR (typically 50-70%) and carries margin call risk
- Life stage approach: Shares in your 20s-30s (liquid, low-cost, globally diversified, compounding). Property in your 30s-40s when income and equity support servicing (leverage amplifies returns in the wealth-building phase). Both in your 40s-50s (diversified income streams and growth). De-risking in 50s-60s as retirement approaches
- Super as a shares vehicle: Super holds most Australians' large share portfolio - via balanced or high-growth options predominantly invested in equities. Many Australians hold more shares than they realise through their super fund
- Tax efficiency across life stages: In accumulation, negative gearing on property suits high-income earners at 37-45%. In retirement, franked dividends from Australian shares are exceptionally tax-efficient (or entirely tax-free in pension phase super)
Roopon: Freeing Up Capital to Invest
Whether you invest in property, shares, or both, reducing everyday spending frees up capital to invest sooner. Roopon members access partner discounts on groceries, fuel, dining and everyday spending across Australia - turning ordinary spending into a source of savings.
from $19.99/month, Roopon membership delivers ongoing savings and entry into the member prize draws (per campaign terms). Join at roopon.com.au. ABN: 89 656 278 830.
Ready to Start Winning?
Join Roopon today for partner discounts plus FREE included prize-draw entries per your plan. Current prizes: /giveaways.

