ETFs vs LICs in Australia: Which Is Better for Long-Term Investors?

Both ETFs and LICs are listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), both provide diversified investment exposure through a single transaction, and both can be bought and sold through a standard brokerage account. Despite these similarities, they are fundamentally different structures with distinct characteristics that affect returns, tax, and investor experience.

• Exchange Traded Fund (ETF): An open-ended managed fund listed on the ASX. When investors buy an ETF, the fund manager creates new units and buys the underlying securities. When investors sell, units are redeemed and securities are sold. The ETF price tracks the net asset value (NAV) of the underlying portfolio very closely - usually within 0.1–0.5%.
• Listed Investment Company (LIC): A closed-ended company structure listed on the ASX. The LIC issues a fixed number of shares at IPO. Investors buy and sell shares between themselves on the market - the LIC itself does not create or redeem shares based on investor demand. Share price is determined by supply and demand, which can differ significantly from the LIC's net tangible assets (NTA) per share.
• Active vs passive: Most ETFs track an index passively (ASX 200, MSCI World). Most LICs are actively managed - a fund manager selects stocks with the aim of outperforming the index. This distinction drives much of the difference in fees and performance outcomes.
• ASX size comparison: As of 2024, ETFs hold approximately $200 billion in assets on the ASX, dwarfing LICs (approximately $50 billion). ETF growth has accelerated as evidence for passive investing has accumulated.
• Examples: ETFs: VAS (Vanguard Australian Shares), VGS (Vanguard International Shares), IVV (iShares S&P 500). LICs: ARGO (Argo Investments), AFI (Australian Foundation Investment Company), MLT (Milton Corporation), MFF (Magellan Financial Group).

---

The most important structural difference between ETFs and LICs - and the primary risk unique to LICs - is the potential for shares to trade at a discount or premium to the underlying net tangible assets (NTA). This is the concept every LIC investor must understand.

• NTA per share: Each LIC reports its NTA (assets minus liabilities divided by shares on issue) regularly - often monthly. This is the underlying value of the portfolio per share, before any market sentiment effect.
• Trading at a discount: If the LIC share price is $1.80 but the NTA is $2.00, you are buying $2.00 worth of assets for $1.80 - a 10% discount. This can be attractive. However, the discount may persist or widen, meaning you may sell at a further discount later.
• Trading at a premium: If the LIC trades above NTA, you are paying more than the underlying assets are worth. This often occurs when a LIC has strong recent performance and investor enthusiasm. Buying at a premium creates an embedded loss if the premium normalises.
• Historical discount patterns: Many active LICs traded at persistent discounts through the 2010s and early 2020s as passive ETFs attracted capital away from active management. The discount mechanism is not self-correcting without a corporate catalyst (buybacks, NTA-resets, or wind-up).
• ETF structure eliminates this risk: Because ETFs create and redeem units on demand, the price stays within a narrow band of NAV. Market makers and authorised participants arbitrage any deviation. An ETF cannot persistently trade at a 10% discount to its underlying portfolio.

---

LICs charge more than index ETFs - sometimes significantly more. Whether that higher fee is justified by outperformance is the central empirical question for Australian investors.

• ETF management fees: Passive Australian equity ETFs charge 0.07–0.23% per year. VAS (Vanguard Australian Shares) charges 0.07%. A200 (BetaShares Australian 200) charges 0.04%. International equity ETFs range from 0.07–0.67% depending on index and fund.
• LIC management fees: Most active LICs charge 0.3–1.5% management fees, plus some charge performance fees (typically 15–20% of outperformance above a benchmark). The true total cost including trading costs inside the portfolio is often higher than the disclosed MER.
• SPIVA Australia Scorecard: The S&P Indices Versus Active (SPIVA) Australia Scorecard is published semi-annually. Over 15 years, approximately 80–90% of active Australian equity managers underperform the S&P/ASX 200 index after fees. This evidence is consistent with comparable studies in the US, UK, and globally.
• Long-tenured LIC exception: The oldest LICs - ARGO, AFI, MLT, Whitefield - have delivered competitive long-term returns after fees over multi-decade periods due to extremely low portfolio turnover, low costs, and conservative management. However, past performance over 20+ years does not guarantee future outperformance.
• Buffered income via reserves: LICs can smooth dividend distributions using profit reserves, paying dividends even in years where portfolio income is low. This is valued by retirees seeking consistent income. ETFs must distribute all income earned - distributions can fluctuate significantly year to year.

---

For Australian investors, the tax treatment of ETFs and LICs differs in ways that can meaningfully affect after-tax returns - particularly for high-income investors.

• LIC capital gains tax deduction: LICs can pass through a tax deduction to shareholders for capital gains realised inside the portfolio - the 'LIC capital gain deduction' under s118-20 of the ITAA 1997. This effectively allows shareholders to access the 50% CGT discount on gains realised inside the LIC at the company level.
• ETF CGT distributions: When an ETF sells securities (due to index rebalancing or investor redemptions), realised capital gains are distributed to unit holders as 'capital gains distributions' - potentially creating a tax event in years you did not sell any ETF units. This is most pronounced for index ETFs with high index turnover or large redemption activity.
• Franking credits - LIC advantage: LICs are companies that pay corporate tax and can pay fully franked dividends. For Australian investors on marginal rates below 30%, franking credits create effective refunds. For investors in the 0% tax bracket (e.g., pension-phase super funds), franking credits are fully refundable.
• ETF tax efficiency for accumulation: For investors in the accumulation phase who do not need income, ETFs with low portfolio turnover (especially buy-and-hold index trackers) are typically more tax-efficient than LICs, which pay regular dividends whether the investor needs the income or not.
• Wrap account and SMSF use: Both ETFs and LICs are suitable for SMSFs. ETFs suit accumulation-phase members wanting low-cost growth. LICs with franking credits suit pension-phase members maximising refundable credits.

---

For most Australian investors in most situations, the evidence favours a core ETF portfolio - but LICs remain relevant in specific contexts. This is not a binary choice; many investors hold both.

• Default recommendation for beginners: Start with low-cost passive ETFs (VAS + VGS or VDHG/DHHF). The evidence for passive outperformance after fees is overwhelming for the 10–30 year horizons relevant to wealth accumulation.
• LICs suitable for income-focused retirees: If you rely on dividends as income and value a smoothed, franked distribution stream, established LICs (ARGO, AFI, MLT) with 50+ year track records and sub-0.2% effective costs offer genuine value alongside - not instead of - ETFs.
• NTA discount as a FREE entry signal: If you choose to invest in a LIC, consider buying at discounts of 5–10%+ to NTA rather than at par or premium. This provides a margin of safety and a potential NTA-discount reversion gain.
• Avoid high-fee active LICs: LICs charging 1%+ fees with no compelling long-term track record are unlikely to outperform a passive ETF equivalent after fees. The burden of proof for active management is high.
• Regular contribution advantage for ETFs: ETFs allow regular smaller purchases (from $50 via some brokers) without the friction of trading at a premium or discount to NTA. For systematic monthly investing, ETFs are structurally better suited.

---

Smart investors manage costs on both sides of the ledger - investment fees and everyday spending. Roopon is Australia's subscription rewards club offering exclusive partner discounts on groceries, dining, fuel, health, and lifestyle services that reduce what members spend each week. Members receive FREE included prize-draw entries per their plan and published campaign terms. See /giveaways for current prizes — they change.

Membership is from $19.99/month. Join at roopon.com. Roopon Pty Ltd ABN 89 656 278 830, 172-178 Maroubra Road, Maroubra NSW 2035.

---

Join Roopon today for partner discounts and FREE included prize-draw entries per your plan and published campaign terms.

Join ROOPON Now