Understanding Australian Listed Investment Companies (LICs)

A listed investment company (LIC) is a publicly listed company whose primary purpose is to invest in a portfolio of other securities - shares, bonds, or other assets. Unlike ETFs, they are companies with boards of directors, not trusts.

• Company structure: a LIC is an ordinary listed company on the ASX; it has shareholders (investors who buy shares), a board of directors, a management team, and an investment mandate - it is not a trust or managed fund
• What it invests in: most Australian LICs invest primarily in ASX-listed shares; some invest internationally or in specific sectors; the portfolio is actively managed by an investment team
• How you invest: you buy LIC shares through your broker like any other share - there is no application form, no minimum investment beyond the share price, and you pay the same brokerage as buying BHP or CBA
• Key difference from ETFs: ETFs have a creation and redemption mechanism that keeps the market price close to the value of underlying assets (NAV); LICs have no such mechanism - the share price is set by supply and demand in the market and can diverge significantly from the value of underlying investments
• Key difference from managed funds: managed funds process applications and redemptions at the daily NAV - the fund always deals at fair value; LICs trade on the market where the price reflects investor sentiment as well as asset value
• History in Australia: some of Australia's largest LICs (Australian Foundation Investment Company, Argo Investments) have operated for more than 70 years - predating ETFs by decades and accumulating large portfolios and strong franking credit reserves

---

The most important LIC concept is the relationship between the share price and the Net Tangible Assets (NTA) per share - the value of the underlying investment portfolio divided by the number of shares on issue.

• NTA per share: the total value of the LIC's investment portfolio minus liabilities, divided by shares on issue; published monthly by most LICs; the equivalent of NAV in a managed fund
• Trading at a discount: if the NTA per share is $2.50 and the share price is $2.25, the LIC trades at a 10% discount to NTA - you are buying $1 of assets for 90 cents; this sounds attractive but a persistent discount offers no guaranteed benefit unless the discount narrows
• Trading at a premium: if the share price is $2.75 against a $2.50 NTA, the LIC trades at a 10% premium - you are paying more for the assets than they are worth; justified only if the premium reflects expected outperformance or other value not captured in NTA
• Why discounts persist: investor sentiment, lack of awareness, low trading volume, and the inability to force the LIC to buy back shares at NTA (unlike a managed fund redemption at NAV) allow discounts to remain for years
• Discount narrowing strategies: some LIC boards implement on-market share buybacks at a discount to NTA, which is accretive to remaining shareholders (buying $1 of assets for 90 cents), and can narrow the discount over time; off-market buybacks at NTA were historically used but have become less common following tax rule changes
• Discount as an opportunity: a high-quality LIC with a strong track record trading at a persistent 10–15% discount to NTA represents a genuine valuation opportunity - but only if the discount is likely to narrow; some LICs have traded at chronic discounts for decades without closing
• NTA pre-tax vs NTA post-tax: LICs publish both pre-tax and post-tax NTA figures; post-tax NTA assumes all unrealised capital gains are taxed at company rates - a more conservative and relevant comparison for investors considering the LIC's after-tax asset value

---

LICs can do something ETFs and managed funds cannot - retain income in good years and draw on reserves to maintain dividends in weak years. This dividend smoothing is genuinely valuable for income-focused investors.

• How ETFs distribute: ETFs are trusts that must distribute essentially all income received each year; if dividend income from the portfolio falls 30% in a weak market year, the ETF distribution falls proportionally - investors receive less income
• How LICs smooth dividends: as companies, LICs can retain a portion of annual income in profitable years, building a profit reserve; in years when portfolio income is lower, the board can draw on retained earnings to maintain or increase the dividend
• AFI (Australian Foundation Investment Company): one of Australia's oldest LICs, has paid consistent or increasing fully franked dividends for decades - demonstrating the dividend smoothing capacity of long-running LICs with large retained earnings
• Argo Investments (ARG): another long-established LIC with a strong record of consistent fully franked dividends; low management cost (close to passive in cost but actively managed)
• Franking credits on LIC dividends: because LICs are Australian companies, their dividends carry franking credits when the LIC has paid Australian company tax on the underlying portfolio income; this is the same franking benefit available from direct share ownership
• Capital gains reserve: LICs that realise capital gains from selling portfolio shares can retain those gains in a capital gains reserve rather than distributing them immediately; when eventually paid out as dividends, the treatment depends on how the dividend is classified - specialist tax advice is recommended for large LIC positions
• Income predictability for retirees: the smoothed dividend feature makes LICs particularly attractive for self-funded retirees who need predictable income; the ability to plan around a consistent, fully franked quarterly dividend has real value for income planning

---

Australia has dozens of LICs - from century-old domestic equity managers to newer international and specialist vehicles. Understanding the key differences helps identify which, if any, suit your portfolio.

• Australian Foundation Investment Company (AFI): one of Australia's largest and oldest LICs; invests primarily in ASX-listed large-cap companies; low management cost; has paid consistent fully franked dividends for more than 70 years; typically trades close to NTA or at a modest discount
• Argo Investments (ARG): similar profile to AFI; one of Australia's largest LICs by market capitalisation; long history of consistent dividends; modest management expense; invests in ASX-listed companies across most sectors
• Milton Corporation (MLT): merged with Washington H. Soul Pattinson and Company in 2021; Soul Pattinson (SOL) is now a significant diversified investment company with exposures beyond listed equities
• Whitefield Industrials (WHF): focuses on industrial companies within the ASX, excluding resources and financial stocks; useful for investors seeking differentiated sector exposure versus AFI/ARG
• BKI Investment Company (BKI): income-focused Australian equity LIC; monthly dividends; fully franked; appeals to retirees wanting frequent income
• International LICs: several LICs invest in global equities; typically have higher fees than domestic LICs; NTA valuation requires currency conversion; less extensive track records than the long-established domestic vehicles
• LIC fees vs ETF fees: the oldest domestic LICs (AFI, ARG) have very low effective management expense ratios (often 0.10–0.20%); comparable to or lower than some ETFs for broad Australian equity exposure; newer and specialist LICs typically charge more

---

LICs and ETFs both provide diversified investment exposure - but the structural differences mean each suits different investor circumstances and priorities.

• Choose ETFs when: you want guaranteed price discovery at or close to NAV, precise exposure to a specific index, the lowest possible fees, or the simplicity of a trust structure with automatic income distribution
• Choose LICs when: you want smoothed dividend income (important for retirees), you find a high-quality LIC at a significant discount to NTA, you value the long-term track record and management of an established LIC, or you want portfolio management through market cycles without making your own rebalancing decisions
• For self-funded retirees: LICs' dividend smoothing, high franking, and predictable income stream are genuine advantages over ETFs which distribute varying amounts each year; the large established LICs (AFI, ARG) have weathered multiple market cycles with sustained income
• For accumulation-phase investors: ETFs typically offer lower cost, greater tax efficiency (in-kind redemption mechanism minimises CGT distributions), and more precise index exposure; the LIC premium/discount complexity adds an unnecessary variable
• Both can coexist: many Australian investors hold both; VAS or an equivalent ETF for the core Australian equity allocation and AFI or ARG for additional income consistency and franking - a practical combination
• Avoid buying LICs at large premiums to NTA: regardless of quality, paying 15–20% above NTA means you are starting with an immediate embedded loss; wait for discounts or NTA parity before initiating or adding to a position

---

LICs are one of Australia's most underappreciated investment structures - offering franked income, decades of track record, and genuine portfolio management at low cost.

Roopon members access partner discounts on investment advice and portfolio reviews - plus FREE included prize-draw entries per your plan and published campaign terms. Join from $19.99/month at roopon.com.au.

---

Join Roopon today for exclusive member discounts plus FREE included prize-draw entries per your plan and published campaign terms.

Join ROOPON Now